In mathematics the art of proposing a question must be held of higher value than solving it.
Georg Cantor

In my last few posts, I studied quantum cohomology as well as the the Dubrovin meromorphic connection I analyzed here as well as the Givental-symplectic space here and finally derived via the orbifold Poincaré pairing embedding

and the Galois relation I derived here

the quantum cohomology central charge integral can be derived as

with $\widetilde {ch}$ and $\widetilde {Td}$ the Chern and Todd characteristic classes respectively I introduced here. I will continue my Givental-Dubrovin analysis in the context of differential geometry, and less from that of moduli spaces, to keep a more unificational faithfulness to Einstein's as well as Witten's intuitions.

A mathematician, like a painter or poet, is a maker of patterns. If his patterns are more permanent than theirs, it is because they are made with ideas ~ G. H. Hardy

Last post, I derived the Orbifold Riemann–Roch Theorem via essential use of Todd-Chern Classes and the Lefschetz-grading operator by deducing the identity

In this post, I will briefly analyze some crucial aspects of the Givental’s symplectic space of quantum cohomology and holomorphic theory